Heritage GIS Architecture & Fundamentals
Scalable, reproducible spatial infrastructure: CRS rigor, governance, metadata, and orchestration patterns for archaeological research.
Automated workflows for archaeologists, heritage managers, and Python GIS developers.
Archaeological projects accumulate complex spatial records across field campaigns, photogrammetric reconstructions, laboratory catalogues, and regulatory deliverables. This resource collects production-grade patterns for engineering those workflows into reproducible, audit-ready pipelines.
Written for archaeologists, heritage managers, Python GIS developers, and academic research teams. Every chapter targets a discrete operational step — from CRS hygiene and PostGIS schema design, to drone ingestion, mesh optimization, and FAIR-aligned metadata.
The site is organised around three pillars that mirror the lifecycle of a heritage GIS programme: foundations and governance, 3D documentation pipelines, and the spatial databases that hold the evidence.
Scalable, reproducible spatial infrastructure: CRS rigor, governance, metadata, and orchestration patterns for archaeological research.
Drone ingestion, dense reconstruction, UV-aware texturing, and batch orchestration for production-grade 3D site mapping.
PostGIS schemas, topological modelling, attribute synchronization and query optimization for multi-season excavation datasets.
New to the site? These hands-on tutorials are the most requested, end-to-end walkthroughs — each one solves a single concrete problem with runnable code you can adapt today.
Field archaeologists and heritage managers routinely generate daily CSV logs from total stations, RTK receivers, and photogrammetry control surveys.…
When querying artifact distributions across multi-season excavation grids, spatial index degradation frequently masquerades as a database scaling…
Stratigraphic modeling in heritage databases requires translating Harris Matrix logic into a spatially aware, relational schema. When excavation units,…
Coordinate precision in archaeological GIS is rarely a decimal-place problem; it is a compound failure of datum epoch alignment, transformation grid…
Regional heritage mapping pipelines frequently fracture at the coordinate reference system (CRS) boundary. When archaeological survey data, LiDAR…
Historical site maps rarely align cleanly with modern GNSS-derived baselines. When digitizing 19th-century cadastral surveys, colonial topographic sheets,…
Heritage GIS projects routinely fail at the version control layer when binary spatial formats collide with standard Git workflows. The most persistent…
Coordinate misalignment remains the primary failure point when transitioning UAV-captured imagery to georeferenced archaeological documentation. Systematic…
Legacy archaeological survey exports—particularly Total Station .csv dumps, ArcView 3.x .shp/.dbf pairs, and early-2000s CAD .dxf conversions—routinely…
When scaling Photogrammetry & 3D Site Mapping Pipelines across multi-seasonal excavation campaigns, Python-driven batch automation frequently encounters a…
Each article ships Python snippets, SQL fragments, and architectural diagrams that can be lifted directly into production. Code blocks include a copy button and inline checklists are interactive — tick items off as you implement them.